Community Development through Bebegig Sukamantri-Themed Souvenir Production for Strengthening Intangible Cultural Heritage and the Creative Economy in Indonesia

Authors

  • Edi Setiadi Putra Architecture and Design Faculty, Institut Teknologi Nasional (Itenas), Bandung, Indonesia.
  • Muhammad Djalu Djatmiko Architecture and Design Faculty, Institut Teknologi Nasional (Itenas), Bandung, Indonesia
  • Iyus Kusnaedi Architecture and Design Faculty, Institut Teknologi Nasional (Itenas), Bandung, Indonesia
  • Ardhiana Muksin Machdi Architecture and Design Faculty, Institut Teknologi Nasional (Itenas), Bandung, Indonesia
  • Abimanyu Al Farisi Architecture and Design Faculty, Institut Teknologi Nasional (Itenas), Bandung, Indonesia
  • Muhammad Rachmat Sarodji Architecture and Design Faculty, Institut Teknologi Nasional (Itenas), Bandung, Indonesia
  • Rizki Muhammad Nurdin Architecture and Design Faculty, Institut Teknologi Nasional (Itenas), Bandung, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51601/ijcs.v6i3.1031

Abstract

The sustainability of Bebegig Sukamantri, an Intangible Cultural Heritage (ICH) of Ciamis Regency, faces significant challenges due to limited community participation in the development of culture-based tourism souvenirs. This condition has hindered the utilization of Bebegig as both a cultural identity and a source of creative economic development. The 2026 Nusantara Arts Innovation Program (PISN) was designed to enhance community capacity through training in the design and production of souvenirs inspired by Bebegig Sukamantri. The program employed a Community Development approach, positioning Sanggar Seni Bebegig Sukamantri Baladdewa as both a partner and the principal actor throughout all stages of implementation. The training integrated Sundanese cultural knowledge, traditional woodcarving techniques, silicone mold-making, and resin casting for souvenir production. The results demonstrated a significant improvement in community capacity. The training successfully improved technical skills by 100% across 20 participants and generated 12 new prototype souvenir designs, benefiting entrepreneurs from several villages in Sukamantri District. The program confirms that a community-based empowerment approach is effective in strengthening the preservation of Intangible Cultural Heritage while simultaneously promoting the creative economy through an adaptive and replicable training model.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] K. Wasela, “The Role of Intangible Cultural Heritage in the Development of Cultural Tourism,” International Journal of Eco-Cultural Tourism, Hospitality Planning and Development, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 15–28, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.21608/ijecth.2024.297283.1004.

[2] M. Vecco, “A definition of cultural heritage: From the tangible to the intangible,” Journal of Cultural Heritage, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 321–324, Jul. 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.culher.2010.01.006.

[3] J. Blake, “On Defining the Cultural Heritage,” ICLQ, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 61–85, Jan. 2000, doi: 10.1017/S002058930006396X.

[4] J. Ife, Community development in an uncertain world: vision, analysis and practice, Second edition. Port Melbourne, VIC, Australia: Cambridge University Press, 2016. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781316342855.

[5] J. Bhattacharyya, “Theorizing Community Development,” Community Development Society. Journal, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 5–34, Mar. 2004, doi: 10.1080/15575330409490110.

[6] L. Kimbell, “Rethinking Design Thinking: Part I,” Design and Culture, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 285–306, Nov. 2011, doi: 10.2752/175470811X13071166525216.

[7] S. J. Tepper, “Creative Assets and the Changing Economy,” The Journal of Arts Management, Law, and Society, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 159–168, Jan. 2002, doi: 10.1080/10632920209596971.

[8] B. N. Avianto, I. Ulumuddin, D. K. Marjanto, U. Sudrajat, and G. Atmadiredja, “The potential of craft industries based on Javanese ethnic culture and the local economy in Indonesia: perspectives of creativity,” Creativity Studies, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 571–588, Nov. 2024, doi: 10.3846/cs.2024.16362.

[9] A. Skulmowski, “Learning by Doing or Doing Without Learning? The Potentials and Challenges of Activity-Based Learning,” Educ Psychol Rev, vol. 36, no. 1, p. 28, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.1007/s10648-024-09869-y.

[10] S. Purnomo, N. Nurmalitasari, and N. Nurchim, “Digital transformation of MSMEs in Indonesia: A systematic literature review,” J. Manag. Digit. Bus., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 301–312, Aug. 2024, doi: 10.53088/jmdb.v4i2.1121.

[11] J. V. Crivello and E. Reichmanis, “Photopolymer Materials and Processes for Advanced Technologies,” Chem. Mater., vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 533–548, Jan. 2014, doi: 10.1021/cm402262g.

[12] W. Chiengkul and P. Kumjorn, “Cultural Souvenir Attributes and Identity-Based Intentions in Heritage Tourism: Scale Development and Validation,” Journal of Quality Assurance in Hospitality & Tourism, pp. 1–21, Feb. 2026, doi: 10.1080/1528008X.2026.2634775.

Downloads

Published

2026-08-16

How to Cite

Edi Setiadi Putra, Muhammad Djalu Djatmiko, Iyus Kusnaedi, Ardhiana Muksin Machdi, Abimanyu Al Farisi, Muhammad Rachmat Sarodji, & Rizki Muhammad Nurdin. (2026). Community Development through Bebegig Sukamantri-Themed Souvenir Production for Strengthening Intangible Cultural Heritage and the Creative Economy in Indonesia. International Journal Of Community Service, 6(3), 502–508. https://doi.org/10.51601/ijcs.v6i3.1031