Strengthening Customary Village Law and Transcendental Communication in the Terunyan Burial Tradition: A Community Engagement Approach in Bali

Authors

  • Ani Purwati Faculty of Law, Sahid University, Indonesia
  • Gita Ruslita Doctoral Program in Communication Studies, Sahid University, Indonesia
  • Aris Yulia Undergraduate Student, Faculty of Law, Sahid University, Indonesia
  • Siti Chariyah Batubara Master’s Student in Law, Sahid University, Indonesia
  • Euis Herlina Mujaswati Master’s Student in Law, Sahid University, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51601/ijcs.v6i1.961

Abstract

The mepasah burial tradition practiced by the Bali Aga community in Terunyan Village, Bali, represents a distinctive form of local wisdom in treating the deceased through open-air placement without burial or cremation. This tradition is grounded in customary village law (awig-awig) and sustained through transcendental communication that constructs symbolic relationships between humans, ancestors, nature, and the local cosmological order. In contemporary social developments, the continuity of the mepasah tradition faces increasingly complex socio-legal challenges, including the declining internalization of awig-awig values among younger generations, the emergence of social friction due to differing interpretations of customary norms, and unequal relations between indigenous communities and external actors, particularly the tourism sector and state institutions. These challenges are exacerbated by the limited operationalization of formal recognition of customary village law within public policy practices, resulting in the marginalization of customary norms when confronted with positivist-oriented health and environmental regulations. This Community Engagement Program (Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat/PKM) focuses on strengthening the customary law of Terunyan Village by positioning transcendental communication as a source of normative and cultural legitimacy in the implementation of burial traditions. The program employs a participatory socio-legal approach through the review of awig-awig, participant observation, focus group discussions (FGDs), and in-depth interviews with customary leaders and community members, in line with the constitutional recognition of indigenous communities under Article 18B paragraph (2) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia and the recognition of customary villages under Law Number 6 of 2014 on Villages. The novelty of this program lies in the design of a customary law strengthening model that integrates transcendental communication as a mediating mechanism between customary norms, the state legal framework, and external tourism pressures. The implementation results demonstrate increased collective legal awareness, strengthened social legitimacy of customary village law, and the formation of transcendental communication patterns that function as mechanisms for social conflict resolution and strategies for customary preservation. These findings affirm that the sustainability of local traditions in Bali requires a harmonious integration of customary law, community social dynamics, and transcendental communication as the foundation of equitable customary village governance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Carey, J. W. (1989). Communication as culture: Essays on media and society. Boston, MA: Unwin Hyman.

[2] Ehrlich, E. (2002). Fundamental principles of the sociology of law (W. L. Moll, Trans.). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers. (Original work published 1913).

[3] Friedman, L. M. (1975). The legal system: A social science perspective. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.

[4] Griffiths, J. (1986). What is legal pluralism? Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, 18(24), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/07329113.1986.10756387

[5] Littlejohn, S. W., Foss, K. A., & Oetzel, J. G. (2016). Theories of human communication (11th ed.). Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press.

[6] MacCannell, D. (1999). The tourist: A new theory of the leisure class (2nd ed.). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

[7] Santos, B. de S. (2002). Toward a new legal common sense: Law, globalization, and emancipation (2nd ed.). London: Butterworths LexisNexis.

[8] von Benda-Beckmann, F. (2007). Legal pluralism and social security. In F. von Benda-Beckmann, K. von

[9] Benda-Beckmann, & A. Griffiths (Eds.), Mobile people, mobile law: Expanding legal relations in a contracting world (pp. 51–74). Aldershot: Ashgate.

[10] The 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia.

[11] Law Number 6 of 2014 on Villages.

[12] Law Number 10 of 2009 on Tourism.

[13] Law Number 32 of 2009 on Environmental Protection and Management.

[14] Law Number 17 of 2023 on Health.

[15] Government Regulation Number 28 of 2024 on the Implementation of Law Number 17 of 2023 on Health.

[16] Bali Provincial Regulation Number 4 of 2019 on Customary Villages in Bali.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-28

How to Cite

Purwati, A., Ruslita, G., Yulia, A., Chariyah Batubara, S., & Herlina Mujaswati, E. (2026). Strengthening Customary Village Law and Transcendental Communication in the Terunyan Burial Tradition: A Community Engagement Approach in Bali. International Journal Of Community Service, 6(1), 7–13. https://doi.org/10.51601/ijcs.v6i1.961